Your tools don't talk.
Someone is filling the gap manually.

Right fit · 6

• Your team is manually copying data between systems that should talk to each other automatically
• A customer action in one platform requires a human to trigger something in another — every time
• Your current 'integration' is a weekly CSV export that someone processes by hand
• You've tried no-code tools like Zapier but hit their limits on volume, logic complexity, or reliability
• You need event-driven real-time connections, not polling or scheduled syncs
• You've had a silent integration failure that caused a data mismatch nobody caught for weeks

Wrong fit · 5

• Your tools don't have APIs — if the software doesn't expose endpoints, there's nothing to integrate at the code level
• You don't have access to both sides of the integration — we can't connect two systems if one side won't grant developer credentials
• A no-code tool like Zapier or Make already solves it — if the connection is simple and low-volume, use the cheaper tool
• You need a one-time data migration rather than an ongoing sync — that's a different scope and a different project
• You want a quick patch, not a proper integration — silent failures and missing error handling are worse than no integration at all