Kyrex

Service · 08 of 08

Pipeline before
incident.

Same pipeline discipline a mature engineering team runs internally — automated deploys, defined branching, fine-grained access, monitoring, incident response.

Kyrex Pipelinefeature/auth-refresh → main → production
Pipeline #148 passing
Commit
Build
Test
Stage
Deploy
Monitor
4m 12s
● STDOUT
> git push origin feature/auth-refresh
> → Triggered pipeline #148
> ▶ Build started · node 20 · next build
> ✓ Build succeeded · 34.2s
> ▶ Running test suite (847 tests)…
> ✓ 847 passed · 0 failed · 96.4% coverage
> ▶ Deploying to staging → health check…
> ✓ Staging healthy · smoke tests passed
> ▶ Promoting to production (rolling)…
> ✓ 3/3 instances healthy · zero downtime
> ✓ Pipeline #148 complete · 4m 12s
● COMMIT HISTORY
a3f9c2efeat(auth): refresh token rotationmain
7d81b4ffix(api): calendly webhook retry logicmain
c924a17perf(db): index on orders.created_atmain
5e30f8cchore: update staging env varsstaging
System Health
Uptime99.9%

30-day SLA

MTTR< 4min

mean time to recovery

Coverage96.4%

test coverage

Incidents0

this month

Every Kyrex project runs this pipeline internally. This isn't a premium tier — it's how we work.

The Kyrex standard

Pipeline discipline · 2026

0%
Engagements on pipeline
Same discipline, every client
0
Disciplines wired
From CI/CD to system audits
0
Manual prod deploys
Every release goes through CI/CD
0min
Mean time to recovery
Across monitored systems

What we build · 7 layers

Seven layers.
One pipeline that holds.

Engineering process across the whole stack — CI/CD, branching, access control, environments, tracking, monitoring, audits. The same pipeline Kyrex runs internally, replicated on your repo.

L01

CI/CD pipeline setup

Automated build, test, and deployment pipeline — code pushed to the right branch triggers the right actions automatically. No manual deployments to production.

L02

Branching strategy

Defined branching model — feature branches, staging, production. Rules for what merges where and when. No more 'I deployed the wrong thing'.

L03

Fine-grained access control

Repository and system access defined by role — developers get what they need, nothing more. Principle of least privilege enforced from the start.

L04

Environment management

Development, staging, and production environments properly separated — what breaks in staging stays in staging.

L05

Project tracking integration

Development work connected to project management — tasks, branches, and deployments linked. The team knows what's in progress, what's blocked, and what shipped.

L06

Server management and monitoring

Production servers monitored, alerts configured, and incident response process defined — so the team knows before users do when something is wrong.

L07

System audits

Existing infrastructure reviewed — bottlenecks identified, risks documented, improvement plan delivered.

Bridge → Engagement

Set up the same pipeline.

All 7 layers — same engineering process Kyrex runs internally, replicated on your repo.

In production · 3 pipelines live

Not a theory.
Already running on every project.

DevOps discipline is present in every Kyrex engagement — it's the operational layer underneath every build.

Caratly
CASE 01Production
Live

CI/CD pipeline

Caratly

Automated deployment pipeline — version-controlled releases, staging environment, production promotion process. Fine-grained repository access for a distributed development workflow.

  • Version-controlled releases with automated build + test
  • Staging → production promotion with rollback strategy
  • Fine-grained repo access for distributed contributors
View case study
OneAtta
CASE 02Production
Live

Multi-platform pipeline

OneAtta

Full pipeline for a multi-platform product — mobile, backend, and infrastructure deployments managed separately with controlled promotion between environments.

  • Separate pipelines for mobile, backend, infrastructure
  • Controlled environment promotion across stages
  • Branch-aware deployment triggers across all 3 layers
View case study
AskKubeir
CASE 03Production
Live

Managed since launch

AskKubeir

Long-running managed engagement — monitoring, alerting, and incident response running continuously since launch. Zero unplanned downtime, every patch applied proactively, every incident handled before the client noticed.

  • Server monitoring + alerting from week one
  • Documented incident response process
  • Same pipeline discipline replicated for every engagement
View case study

How we approach this

Process you can replicate.
Not theory you have to interpret.

Kyrex doesn't sell DevOps as a theory. Every Kyrex project — from Caratly to OneAtta — runs on the same pipeline discipline: automated deployments, defined branching strategy, fine-grained access controls, and project tracking connected to the codebase.

When Kyrex sets this up for a client, it's replicating a proven system — not implementing a framework from a blog post. The client gets the engineering process discipline of a mature team, without hiring one.

The Kyrex standard

  • Every project Kyrex delivers runs on this pipeline internally.
  • It is not an add-on or a premium tier — it is how Kyrex works.
  • Making it available as a standalone service means clients get the same rigour applied to their own teams.

Fit check

Honest about who
this is for.

Right fit · 6

  • You have a development team but no engineering process — deployments are manual, branching is informal, and production is unpredictable
  • You've had a production incident and realised you had no rollback strategy, no monitoring, and no documented response process
  • You're hiring developers for the first time and want to set the process up correctly from day one instead of fixing it later
  • Your team is growing and the informal 'push to main' workflow isn't scaling to more than two people
  • You want the same pipeline discipline a mature engineering team runs internally, without hiring a senior DevOps engineer full-time
  • You're taking on a technical audit of an existing codebase and need clarity on where the process risks are

Wrong fit · 5

  • You're a solo developer with no plans to grow the team — the overhead of a formal pipeline isn't justified for a single-person workflow
  • Your product isn't in production yet — pipeline setup before anything is deployed is premature; build the product first, harden the process after
  • You want a one-time setup with no ongoing involvement — DevOps discipline degrades without maintenance; we implement systems, not one-off configurations
  • You're still on shared hosting — there's no deployment pipeline worth setting up until you have infrastructure you control
  • You're looking for someone to manage your developers day-to-day — we implement process and tooling, not project management or team oversight

DevOps & Reliability · Engagement options

Need pipeline discipline?
Audit where it's breaking first.

Most teams arrive thinking they need CI/CD. Some actually need a clearer branching strategy or just access control. The Blueprint audits your process and tells you what to fix in what order — independent research, ₹15k credited if you proceed.

Path 01 · Start a project

If you know where the process is breaking and want it fixed.

Start a project.

Brief us on your stack and what's already broken. We come back within one business day with scope, timeline, and cost.

Path 02 · The BlueprintRecommended

If you've never had a formal pipeline and don't know where to start.

Get the Blueprint.

A fixed-fee engagement. We audit your existing infrastructure, map process risks, and hand you a written report on what to fix first and why — yours to keep, with us or without.

₹15,000· credited if you proceed
[email protected]Reply within 1 business day